Op zondag 12 november is er een landelijke klimaatmars in Amsterdam. Een bont gezelschap van organisaties die soms verder niet veel gemeenschappelijk hebben, vragen aandacht voor klimaatverandering en voor een rechtvaardige verdeling van de lasten die het stoppen ervan met zich mee zal brengen.
Waarom zo’n klimaatmars, waarom zoveel verstorende acties? Een belangrijke reden die een organisatie als Extinction Rebellion aanvoert voor hun acties is dat het niet zozeer vijf voor twaalf is, maar eerder vijf seconden voor twaalf. Of zelfs vijf over twaalf.
Hoewel ik het op veel punten niet echt eens ben met XR hebben ze hier toch wel enig gelijk. Daarom heb ik eens een overzicht gemaakt van recent klimaatnieuws dat ik vond op wetenschappelijke fora. Dit is zeker geen uitputtend overzicht, ik heb dit nieuws van een aantal sites met wetenschapsnieuws waarvoor ik een account heb, en van een groep ‘scientists who do climate’ op X. Ik ben tot maximaal 30 oktober teruggegaan voor de sites, en een klein stukje op X. De berichten zijn onderverdeeld in ‘slecht nieuws’ en ‘goed nieuws’.
As a scientist, you need funding. These days, most funding has to come from external sources, such as national funding agencies, the European Union or funding organizations aimed at specific topics, like the Dutch Kidney Foundation (Nierstichting Nederland).
To get funding, you will have to write a proposal outlining your plans, preferably supported by some pilot evidence. However, a good plan and some good preliminary results are often not enough. Most funding programs are heavily oversubscribed, so you have to stand out in the crowd – not only by good science but also by a good presentation.
Your proposal should be convincing and persuasive. Convincing means that you present your ideas and preliminary data in a clear manner. You can’t just list all your ideas and accomplishments, you need to present them in a story. That may sound odd to a scientist, but we’re not talking fiction here, nor a sales pitch, but a presentation that follows a clear storyline that allows the reader to follow your reasoning and see where you want to go.
That’s where editorial support comes in. As a science writer, I have ample experience in getting to the heart of your project and making sure the ‘story’ of your proposal is clear. Editing is not (just) about dotting i’s and crossing t’s, it is also about presenting your message as clearly as possible.
For a specialist in any field, the danger is always to skip steps in an explanation. As a non-specialist, I’m bound to notice those. In my short lecture ‘The Art of Scientific Storytelling’ I can take you through this process. And I can also go through your funding proposal and point out ways to make it more clear and more persuasive.
As 2022 draws to a close, it’s interesting to look back. The ‘offices’ of Scientific Dutchman (i.e. my home) relocated from Roden to Kampen. This year, I continued to write for the Nederlands Dagblad newspaper (some seven short science news stories per week) and the website geloofenwetenschap.nl (three news items per month). These two were exclusively in Dutch. I also wrote stories for a number of other clients, produced some SEO web texts for a company selling analytical equipment (all in English), gave a talk on developments in reproductive technology for a student society and did some editing for grant applications.
I wrote this story to mark the 2021 World Health Organization World Antimicrobial Awareness Week, on new ways to fight antimicrobial resistance using concepts from #ecology and #evolution. Fighting bacteria with bacteria! Work by Marjon de Vos at Faculty of Science and Engineering – University of Groningen and colleagues, featuring Timo van Eldijk:
For the Chemport Europe website and newsletter, I have written two short articles on companies active in Green Chemistry in the Northern Netherlands. The first is on the Airo Group in Stadskanaal, which produces a range of product groups, based on vegetable oil, for lubrication, greasing and cleaning. Their biodegradable products should be free of hazard labels and have at least the same quality as fossil oil-based products, at a competitive price. This journey started when one of the companies founders, John Borgesius, came back from a bike ride with a chain blackened by dirt sticking to the chain oil.
This letter asks for a scientific debate on covid-19. I fully agree with that. However, the implication of the letter is that right now, the debate is unscientific, some voices are stifled and there is altogether too much panic. I beg to differ. I am not giving a line-by-line analysis, that should take too long. Just a few points that stood out for me.
1) A number of courageous individuals are attacked, ignored, stifled. I don’t know all these names, but one stood out: prof. Ioannidis. He has indeed been criticized. However, what I would like to point out here is that further on in the letter, it is said that the infection rate for covid-19 is comparable to the seasonal flue in Bulletin of the WHO, Article ID BLT.265892. Two remarks on this statement. a) It is presented as a WHO statement, but this is not true. It is a paper published in a WHO journal. b) The author of this paper is prof. Ioannidis. So he is allowed to publish his conclusions. And yes, this elicited criticism (see for example https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/p6tto8hl/release/1), but that is how science works.
Scientific Dutchman is a one-man company. It has a name because that’s required for registration at the Chamber of Commerce. But it is just me: René Fransen. I’ve loved science for as long as I can remember. Eventually, I studied Biology at UtrechtUniversity, where I subsequently did a PhD and a postdoc, both at the University Medical Centre.
In 1995, I took a course in science journalism at SCW in Amsterdam and started to write on science. A year later, I became Science editor at the University of Groningen newspaper Universiteitskrant. In 2012, I moved to the Faculty of Science and Engineering at the same university as ‘Science Writer’, and increased my activities as a freelance science writer and consultant, which became ‘Scientific Dutchman’.
My last contribution to the University of Groningen website in 2019: an interesting study by enzyme engineer Marco Fraaije and colleagues. They reconstructed the ancestral gene sequence for three human enzymes, expressed the protein and analyzed its structure. (The current enzymes were not stable enough to study, the ancestral ones are!) The result is an interesting paper describing the structure and function of these flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs).
I have two
workshops on offer for scientists. The Art of Scientific Storytelling tells you
how to write your grant proposal as clear and catchy as possible. This workshop
has been tried and tested over many years.
Slightly newer, but also well-received, is the Reach Out workshop that will teach you to write a popular summary of your work.
working on a grant proposal at the moment, or writing other research-related
texts? During the month of February, I am offering free editing on 15 abstracts.
I have been
editing dozens of research proposals since 2011, written to different funding
agencies, mainly for University of Groningen scholars. I would like to extend
my client network (which already includes grant proposals Belgium, Germany and
the US), so that’s why I am offering this ‘free trial’.